ArticleViewAbstractPharmacognosy Journal,2025,17,6,322-328.DOI:10.5530/pj.2025.17.102Published:December 2025Type:Original ArticlePreclinical Safety Assessment of a Polyherbal Formulation: Acute, Subchronic, and Mutagenic EvaluationEnkhmaa Gonchig, Chimgee Tserendash, Maral-Erdene Gerelt-Od, Batdavaa Batbayar, Mend-Amar Batbaatar, Perleidulam Bunddulam, Enerel Yeruult, Narankhajid Myadagsuren, Otgonbat Altangerel, and Yeruult Chultemsuren Enkhmaa Gonchig1, Chimgee Tserendash1, Maral-Erdene Gerelt-Od1, Batdavaa Batbayar1, Mend-Amar Batbaatar1, Perleidulam Bunddulam2, Enerel Yeruult2, Narankhajid Myadagsuren3, Otgonbat Altangerel4*, Yeruult Chultemsuren1* 1Department of Pharmacology, School of Biomedicine, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Zorig street, post office 48/111, Ulaanbaatar 14210, MONGOLIA. 2School of Regional Innovation and Social Design Engineering, Kitami Institute of Technology, Hokkaido 090-8507, JAPAN. 3Department of Biology, School of Biomedicine, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Zorig street, post office 48/111, 14210 Ulaanbaatar, MONGOLIA. 4Department of Hematology, School of Medicine, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Zorig street, post office 48/111, 14210 Ulaanbaatar, MONGOLIA. Abstract:Introduction: Before market approval, novel herbal medicines and bioactive compounds require rigorous genotoxicity and safety evaluations. A polyherbal formulation derived from Dasiphora fruticosa, Cynara scolymus, and Rosa acicularis has previously demonstrated antioxidant and nephroprotective properties. However, comprehensive toxicological and mutagenicity evaluations are needed to support its clinical development. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the acute and subchronic toxicities and mutagenic potential of this polyherbal formulation. Methods: Acute oral toxicity was assessed in C57BL/6 mice using a two-phase protocol based on Lorke's method. Subchronic toxicity was evaluated in Wistar rats following OECD guideline 407, with daily oral administration of the polyherbal formulation at doses of 500 and 1,000 mg/kg for 28 days. Mutagenicity was assessed using the Muta-Chromoplate (Ames test) kit according to OECD guideline 471. Results: Acute toxicity evaluation determined that the median lethal dose (LD50) of the polyherbal formulation exceeds 5,000 mg/kg, categorising it as practically nontoxic. The subchronic toxicity assessment revealed that doses of 500 and 1,000 mg/kg had no significant effects on body and organ weight, haematological and biochemical parameters, and histopathological features compared with the controls. Furthermore, the Ames test confirmed that the polyherbal formulation had no mutagenic activity. Conclusions: The polyherbal formulation exhibited no acute toxicity at doses up to 5,000 mg/kg, and no adverse effects were observed in a 28-day subchronic toxicity study. Furthermore, its favourable safety profile was further confirmed by its lack of mutagenic potential. Collectively, these findings provide a robust foundation for continued preclinical and clinical development of the polyherbal formulation Keywords:acute toxicity; mutagenicity; phytochemicals; polyherbal formulation; safety evaluation; subchronic toxicityView:PDF (449.75 KB) PDF Images Body weight measurements of rats administered the polyherbal formulation. *Data is presented as the mean ± SEM ‹ Synergistic antioxidant and antidiabetic activities of Tinospora cordifolia and Azadirachta indica extracts supported by in-silico molecular docking and ADMET evaluation up Effect of Components of Gamma Oryzanol on Toll-Like Receptor 4: Receptor Structure-Based Pharmacophore, Hit Identification, and In Silico Evidence ›